If we really want to tackle some of the biggest environmental problems we face we need to look at where our energy comes from. We can no longer continue to burn fossil fuels at the current rate. Colchester & NE Essex FoE have been active in gathering support for both the Bradwell and Earls Hall Farm Wind Farm proposals.

Earls Hall Wind Farm Proposal

With Essex a long way from meeting its renewable energy targets, Clacton-on-Sea is the latest area to be identified by one of the leading wind energy companies keen to help secure the area's future energy supply, whilst helping to tackle climate change.

Npower Renewables selected a site at Earls Hall Farm for a 5 turbine scheme which, if built, could provide enough electricity for the average annual needs of between 5,500 and 6,000 homes.

Investigations took place into the suitability of the site and an application for planning permission was submitted.

Project Manager Vicky Portwain said, "Although a relatively small wind farm, this scheme can make a valuable contribution towards the ongoing battle against climate change due to its windy location and the efficiency of modern wind turbines. The 5 turbines would offset the release of between 22,000 and 26,900 tonnes of Carbon Dioxide. To put that into perspective that's the equivalent of removing between 7,160 and 8,762 cars off the roads of Essex."

She added, "This is one of the few potential sites in Essex suitable for a wind farm scheme of this scale which would contribute significantly towards both local, regional and national targets and objectives for renewable energy and reduction in CO₂."

The proposed development has been welcomed by Paula Whitney, Co-ordinator of Colchester & NE Essex Friends of the Earth who said, "Essex is particularly susceptible to flooding and other severe weather effects because of climate change. A report from Oxford University blows away the myth that wind is intermittent. A study lasting over thirty years across the whole of Britain, showed Britain has wind power which is available all year round and when electricity is needed most.

The Eastern Region has set a target of 10% renewable energy by 2010 and these five wind turbines would provide enough electricity to meet the average needs of the whole of St Osyth and Brightlingsea."

Paula Whitney and Val Mainwood, spokesperson for BRARE (BRAdwell for Renewable Energy), went on a site visit with Vicky Portwain of Npower Renewables to Earls Hall Farm in autumn 2006, and both thought it was a suitable site.

In January 2007 four of our members went on a coach trip to see eight similar turbines at Deeping St Nicholas in Lincolnshire. We were impressed with the wind farm and in particular noted how quiet the turbines were - 'a gentle hum' was how one of the members described it.

After the application was lodged in early 2007, Colchester FoE helped raise many letters of support at stalls at local fairs. The nationally-orchestrated anti-windpower people got into full swing and whipped up strong local opposition with many hundreds of letters of objection. However, we believe even more letters of support have been lodged.

We later discovered in October 2007 that Essex Wildlife Trust (EWT) had written objecting to the siting of one of the turbines which is in the vicinity of Hartley Wood. It is 70m from the woodland and EWT believe this turbine should be resited to a position at 180m distance as shown in a previous plan. They are concerned about the hazard to bats present in the woodland. However, Natural England has not objected and does not share their concern. EWT supports the windfarm and the five turbines in principle.

Because of this objection the Co-ordinator had a whole-day site visit in mid-November 2007 with Cath Stevenson of Npower Renewables, looking at the site and maps and discussing the potential for resiting the fifth turbine. We were given a map with more detail showing the three wide restrictive buffer strips crossing the site - the line of local grid pylons, a gas pipeline and a Vodafone link set distance. This limits the resiting of the fifth turbine to one spot south of the line of local pylons.

Three members of CFoE - Hildegard Hill, Tim Morris and Paula Whitney - had a subsequent unaccompanied site visit and agreed we would support the resiting of the turbine south of the pylons as our preferred choice.

However, if this were not possible, we would accept the micro-siting which has been suggested by Npower Renewables to 90m away from the woodland, but still to the north of the line of local pylons. This was also supported by the members at a group meeting. We all strongly support having five turbines on Earls Hall Farm.

Tim and Paula took our Regional Campaign Co-ordinator, Mary Edwards, on an unaccompanied tour of the Earls Hall Farm site in January 2008. Mary supported our stance and we all agreed that these turbines would be a very good way to help in the local fight to combat climate change - with clean renewable electricity from this windfarm providing the equivalent current electricity needs of the whole of Brightlingsea and St Osyth villages.

Update: This application was turned down by Tendring councillors because of the hostile local anti-wind group, and it will hopefully go to a public inquiry. We believe an independent Inspector will look at the issues and it would be up to him to require resiting or micro-siting of the turbine at the inquiry.

'Wind farms just a huge stealth tax' letter response (.PDF)

Letter to Clacton Gazette regarding wind power -- 2/12/08

Take Action on Earls Hall

Details of the current appeal process and suggestions for letter-writing appear on the news page.

Bradwell Wind Farm Proposal

Npower Renewables submitted a proposal for twenty wind turbines on the Dengie peninsula behind the nuclear power station at Bradwell-on-Sea. Two anti-wind groups were formed - BATTLE and SIEGE. They threatened to march on St Paul's Cathedral, the largest landowner involved. In spite of much pro-wind lobbying, St Paul's pulled out.

A smaller windfarm of ten turbines was then proposed on farmers' land who were fully supportive of windpower. A large number of objections were received by Maldon council, who also objected to the proposal.

Colchester & NE Essex Friends of the Earth helped raise an even larger number of letters of support. When it was reported that Colchester council had objected to the proposal we discovered that a planning officer had unilaterally objected without consulting council Cabinet members. In the nick of time a week before the deadline, Colchester council's leader wrote a letter of support. There was a considerable fuss about the officer's action.

Npower Renewables appealed against Maldon council's rejection of the proposal. A public inquiry was held, with the Inspector spending a lot of time investigating, including three days of the inquiry spent at Southend Airport to investigate whether there were any problems. The Inspector gave the windfarm the go-ahead.

This was then challenged by the anti-wind groups. After a long delay, it was announced that the same Inspector will reconvene the Inquiry for a short time next Spring, dealing with the perceived issue of noise alone. We hope for a favourable outcome after this short intervention.

If constructed the wind farm could produce enough green power to meet the average annual electricity needs of between 8,100 and 10,600 homes, making an important contribution to both local and national renewable energy targets. This would be the equivalent of a third of Maldon district's homes.

Take Action on Bradwell

If you want more information about this site please email bradwell@npower-renewables.com.

Nuclear Power

Colchester FoE, and in particular certain members, were heavily involved in years of campaigning for the closure of Bradwell Nuclear Power Station, which closed in 2004; then, in the national Magnox Decommissioning Dialogue process, campaigning with others for the safe early decommissioning of all Magnox nuclear stations to greenfield site status. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) was set up and recommended 25 year decommissioning instead of 100+ years.

With other local campaigners we strongly opposed the incineration of low level radioactive oils, solvents and scintillants upwind of Mersea Island just across the Blackwater estuary. We delayed this for years and then after they had only incinerated a small amount they finally agreed to take it off the site for disposal.

On March 7th 2007, the East Anglian Daily Times headlined with the lead story 'Nuclear Future? New Reactor Fear: Protestors vow to fight as British Energy buys land'. This story reveals that land has been purchased adjacent to the existing nuclear power station currently being decommissioned, with a view to building a new nuclear power station.

Colchester FoE's Co-ordinator, Paula Whitney, is quoted as saying that "residents would fight against any new proposals for a new nuclear plant at Bradwell" adding "The site is hugely threatened by a rise in sea levels, it is very vulnerable to flooding and it is on an earthquake fault line. The island is very antagonistic about it. We are downwind of the site, and if anything happened we could not escape. There is a very good fighting force here from different parts of the community - we are very strong and we will fight it".

There was a CBC scrutiny panel meeting at the Mersea MICA hall on Tuesday 23rd September at 6pm, with speakers for and against nuclear power (report link below).

From the ENDS bulletin: Slash renewables target to protect nuclear, says EDF -- 12/3/09

Article in Gazette: 'Power bosses due in court' -- 30/12/08

Letter to the press: We can reject nuclear.

Press release from BANNG: Report on Bradwell meeting in West Mersea on 23/9/08

Blackwater Against New Nuclear Group

In response to the proposals for a new nuclear plant at Bradwell, the group BANNG has been formed. The purpose of the Group is to seek to protect the people and environment of the River Blackwater estuary and its surrounding area, now and in the future, from the risks and dangers of radioactivity by preventing the further development of nuclear activity in the estuary.

Here are various documents relating to the new group (all .DOC):
Article by Andy Blowers in Guardian 12-03-08
BANNG Aims and Strategy
BANNG Launch Press Release
BANNG Press Release 13-06-08
BANNG Update 20-06-08
Also, see the press release reporting on the recent meeting in West Mersea.

The group now has its own website: BANNG

Bradwell nuclear site update - BANNG demo 9th April 2009

The Strood is the road leading off Mersea Island to the mainland, the one exit route in the case of a nuclear incident. It also floods twice a day at the highest tides in Spring and Autumn, sometimes for as much as two hours. Mersea is just across the Blackwater estuary, downwind of the old Bradwell nuclear Magnox site being decommissioned over the next hundred years or so, and now proposed for possibly two new nuclear plants.

BANNG (Blackwater Against New Nuclear Group) held a demo on both sides of the Strood on Thursday 9th April at the 1pm tide which covered the Strood. They had some excellent placards and a banner, with yellow and black balloons on sticks. They leafletted and talked to all the drivers of cars stuck at both sides of the flooded Strood.

BBC LookEast covered it very well in the 6.30pm and 10.30pm regional news on Thursday 9th April and the local Gazette had a colour picture and good article on Friday. Here is a letter from Mersea resident Ian Clarke about the Strood issue.

We also have a letter from Ian Clarke to the Gazette and EADT about the effects on fisheries of the cooling water intake: A nuclear powered vacuum cleaner ?

Page updated 6/6/09